John Carter of Mars: Sci-Fi of the Past?
March 5th 2012 13:17
John Carter is a story of a man out of place. Transported to the planet Mars by an alien artefact, John Carter’s situation in the story inspired by author Edgar Rice Burroughs, is something of a controversial idea back in the 1930s. The planned film of the pulp fiction series was scrapped due to concerns that the movie-going audience would not be appreciative of the idea of people living on Mars, much less the idea of a Confederate soldier from Virginia teleported to the planet across thousands and thousands of miles of empty space. In that time, an orphaned baby raised by apes made more sense, which was likely why John Carter faded from pop culture. Unlike Tarzan who stayed “grounded,” John Carter got stranded somewhere where no one had solid reference to.
Now, more than 70 years later, John Carter is making a comeback—finally, on the silver screen. But unlike in the 1930s when audiences were more down to earth, people today are less inclined to be awed by such out-of-this-world stories if the ideas involve concepts proven by science with hardly any reasonable doubt, to be not true or far from plausible. In the John Carter series, the planet Mars is portrayed as inhabited by various cultures and nations—warring people who call their home planet Barsoom. Of course, we all know that Mars isn’t inhabited and there aren’t even traces of ancient civilization from the data sent back by orbiting satellites, landers, and rovers on the ground. What we know now about the Red Planet thus makes the idea of John Carter on Mars much less science fiction that it was in the 1930s. It’s more of a fantasy of the past.
Nevertheless, what’s old can still be new if it still entertains. It’s akin to the arena of gladiators where good people have seen warriors kill and get killed, again and again. But like what actor Russell Crowe so memorably declared, “Are you not entertained?” Embarrassing as it is, we have to admit that even if we’re already jaded by all the fantastic things fed to us by science-fiction films, we’re still entertained. We’re guaranteed to be entertained if the story is formulaic and the scenes packaged. If it’s action, you expect action; if it’s horror, you expect horror; if it’s romance, you expect love. John Carter is about John Carter on Mars. What you see is what you get, and in this kind of movie, you simply dive into the experience even if you can’t suspend the belief that it’s all not real.
John Carter is directed by Andrew Stanton (remember Walll-E?) and starring Taylor Kitsch and Lynn Collins. Sure, it’s reminiscent of movies like the classic Conan the Barbarian, He-Man, and Yor, but a good story is still a good story, and if John Carter has the sci-fi cowboy action to boot and the 3-D goodies to delight, then it will get an audience, like those sci-fi fans who like Burroughs.
Now, more than 70 years later, John Carter is making a comeback—finally, on the silver screen. But unlike in the 1930s when audiences were more down to earth, people today are less inclined to be awed by such out-of-this-world stories if the ideas involve concepts proven by science with hardly any reasonable doubt, to be not true or far from plausible. In the John Carter series, the planet Mars is portrayed as inhabited by various cultures and nations—warring people who call their home planet Barsoom. Of course, we all know that Mars isn’t inhabited and there aren’t even traces of ancient civilization from the data sent back by orbiting satellites, landers, and rovers on the ground. What we know now about the Red Planet thus makes the idea of John Carter on Mars much less science fiction that it was in the 1930s. It’s more of a fantasy of the past.
Nevertheless, what’s old can still be new if it still entertains. It’s akin to the arena of gladiators where good people have seen warriors kill and get killed, again and again. But like what actor Russell Crowe so memorably declared, “Are you not entertained?” Embarrassing as it is, we have to admit that even if we’re already jaded by all the fantastic things fed to us by science-fiction films, we’re still entertained. We’re guaranteed to be entertained if the story is formulaic and the scenes packaged. If it’s action, you expect action; if it’s horror, you expect horror; if it’s romance, you expect love. John Carter is about John Carter on Mars. What you see is what you get, and in this kind of movie, you simply dive into the experience even if you can’t suspend the belief that it’s all not real.
John Carter is directed by Andrew Stanton (remember Walll-E?) and starring Taylor Kitsch and Lynn Collins. Sure, it’s reminiscent of movies like the classic Conan the Barbarian, He-Man, and Yor, but a good story is still a good story, and if John Carter has the sci-fi cowboy action to boot and the 3-D goodies to delight, then it will get an audience, like those sci-fi fans who like Burroughs.
| 12 |
| Vote |












Add Comments











Read More
















